Sarah Hands

likes to abuse James Foden's Incapacity otherwise known as Monica Ryder because she knows he is too incapacitated to prevent her. Camelia Monica Ryder incapacity to deprive him of his liberty to Skype against Monica Ryder's relentless abuse of his his loved ones who he grew up with and who grew up with him. James is 20 and has a mental age of 2 to 4 and is defenceless as unfit and unworthy to contact him in the most highly two brothers : Sasha and Sirus and Sister Simone targeted way by targeting ALL of the professionals involved in James's care. Monica Ryder has libelled and defamed James father, in James's care to aid and abet her to abuse James's incapacity she has deceitfully manipulated & groomed all of the professionals to airbrush out of his defenseless life his father, brothers and sister To cause maximum devastation and distress to James's family daytime care to professional care workers except Monday nights until he was 13 to support her full time job. Then she outsourced and every other weekend when James stayed with his paternal family. who she was so happy to leave James with during his daytime hours until late summer 2014 when she cruelly made herself incommunicado of his fortnightly Skype calls to his father, brothers and Sister in 2012 and pushed James under the radar for 2 months - a distressful time Monica Ryder took over from James's grandparents as the connector Adult Social Services where I received a frosty reception from James now After 2 months of not knowing if my son was alive or dead I contacted Solihull known to be renegade social worker: Katy Ivko who told me James cannot see during which James had vanished from the face of the earth. awareness of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 S16 & the Disability Discrimination decides who my incapacitated son can or cannot see. Clearly, Ms Ivko has no Laws & the truth about James loving relationship and strong bonds with his his loved ones any more because his principal carer is his carer and as such she loving relationship with paternal family amounts to Professional Negligence. Katy Ivko's lack of knowledge of the law and the facts surrounding her client's Ivco fully supports Ryder's past & ongoing abuse of James's incapacity. paternal family who raised him to the age of 13 during his daytime hours. with 3 siblings who will one day be the only family he has left to keep an eye on him, of my son's incapacity to deprive him of his liberty to Skype & continue his loving relationship visit him & bring his nephews and nieces to visit him - he adores children and babies. Solihull Council, via their complaints team, also fully support Ryder's ongoing abuse Council fully supports the abusive airbrushing of a defenseless incapacitated & libellous comments about James's family that Ryder fed them and the person's loved ones out of his life & fully supports the renegade Katy Ivko Solihull Council, via there complaints team, also fully support the tissue of lies the renegade and Professionally Negligent Katy Ivko who covered up for the have aided & abetted Ryder's abuse of my son's incapacity by covering up for abusive Ryder who likes to abuse my son's incapacity to deprive him of loved aiding & abetting my son's abuse by covering it up. Therefore Solihull Council my defenceless young adult son are: Alison Coppock, Liz Gillespie & The Solihull Council employees who have gone on the record to officially abuse Karen Millard who all officially support Katy Ivko's and Monica Ryder's abuse ones just because she knows she can and she knows it hurts. and who grew up with him. As I've proven that Solihull Council only recognise of his loving relationship with his growing paternal family who he grew up with laws that suit their cause - they will not recognise the Mental Capacity Act 2005 of my son's incapacity and they have all worked relentlessly to deprive my son recognise the libel laws because they will think that the exposing of their disadvantage to his non incapacitated 20 year old peers and they will abuse of a vulnerable person's incapacity libels them! They won't realise that & the Disability Discrimination laws to stop them from putting my son at a As Solihull Council are so selective in the laws they are prepared to recognise unfit and unworthy to maintain the loving relationship they've had for 20 years. I present you with James's website that exposes Solihull Council with detailed evidence. the only people who've been libelled are James's father, brother's & sister - as

Please subscribe to and enjoy my beautiful son’s expression of his love for his paternal family on the beautiful videos on James’s YouTube channel: https://youtube.com/@jamesfoden

In my first contact with Sarah Hands – James’s new social worker – she still attempted to argue that the Mental Capacity Act provides provision for incapacitated adults to choose what they want to do and therefore James does not need to see his family if he doesn’t want to. Well it does provide this provision and I don’t disagree with that however the broad thrust of the act requires carers to act in the incapacitated young adults best interests and that requires recognizing the extent of the incapacitated person’s incapacity. If my 21 year old son had a mental capacity of a 12 year old it would be no problem for me of he wanted to skip his 10 minute Skype session with his family on a particular week. However he only has a mental age of two and Solihull Social Services are still not ware of this after James being a customer for 8 years.

“Two year olds are not allowed to see their family if they choose not to” – Sara Hands

“I have been notified this morning that the carers are unable to support James to the day centre to carry out the skype call.

The care provided to James involves James being supported to decide on his activity. James has chosen to go on a journey that does not allow time to come to the centre. I have been advised that trying to get James to change his planned route has resulted in him become distressed.” Sarah Hands

Sarah is clearly stating  – to paraphrase – that “two year olds are not allowed to see their family if they choose not to”

Here is an extract of a recent letter to a Solihull Council solicitor:

“Can we see James on Skype please. He only saw us 3 times in the summer holiday due to his social worker’s (Sarah Hands) lack of knowledge of his mental capacity and reasoning skills. She labours under the misapprehension of it being normal for two year old children not to be able to see their families if the two year old chooses not to. She doesn’t understand that two year olds don’t have the capacity to make such a complex decision and she doesn’t understand that James’s micro-cephalic and malformed brain doesn’t contain sufficient neurons for him to make such a complex decision in the same way as a two year old doesn’t have the capacity to make such a complex decision. He simply doesn’t have the capacity to understand what he’s giving up if a negligent social worker or psychologist takes him at his word when asked a question such as “do you want to see Sasha”.

Solihull Social services can hire as many negligent social workers and psychologists as they want in order to justify their abuse of my son but they cannot get past the fact that my son’s brain doesn’t contain enough neurons to make such a complex decisions AND understand what he is giving up as a result of making such a decision.

It’s shocking that Solihull social services have reverted back to their ridiculously flawed argument that two year olds are not allowed to see their families if they choose not to. Their ridiculous argument has been dismissed for the last two years and its shocking that they are still making this argument and the more they make this argument the more it will be dismissed.”

My son’s brain scan interpretation carried out by James’s paediatric Neurologist, supplied to me by his general practitioner, clearly states that the malformations in his brain will leave him forever incapacitated at circa two year old on his capacity and this is why he still wears nappy’s and watches the Teletubbies.

Psychologists are inferior to doctors

In the discipline of psychology there is no paradigm that all psychologists subscribe to. There are instead several schools of thought and different psychologists subscribe to different schools of thought. Conversely, in medicine, all doctors recognize the discipline of medicine and all doctors recognize radiography and accept that CT scans and MRI scans actually do reflect and portray the state of an individual’s health and the extent to which the patient is in good health or poor health and the limits of his capacity.

Therefore I will not accept any psychologist evidence that describes my son’s capacity at higher than circa two years old. Any such psychologists’s report is mere superfluous balderdash and such a psychologist will need to be exposed in the public interest for aiding and abetting the abuse of a severely incapacitated young adult.

There is no reason why James’s true mental capacity cannot be recognized and I will help him to get it recognized.